The FamilyEllis

Mary Ellis

1772–1810

✦ direct ancestorOwen's 5×-great-grandmother · Crouch line

Life

Born
1772 · Virginia, United States
Died
1810 · Overton County, Tennessee, USA

Marriage & children

SpouseElijah Crouch (1770–c. 1825) m. 16 Jan 1792 · Washington, Tennessee, USA
William E. Crouch (1792–1863)
Elizabeth Crouch (1795–c. 1825)
Samuel W Crouch (c. 1797–1855)
Nathan Crouch (1798–1865)
Benedict Crouch (1800–1882)
Elisha Crouch (1802–1883)
Stephen Crouch (c. 1806–c. 1859)
Joseph E. Crouch (1821–1907)

Timeline

Records behind this page

Unnamed source
Elijah Crouch (1770-1825) of Washington and McMinn Cos., TENNESSEE — the page this tree's gens 7-8 were copied from (read from the live site, controls run)
read the transcript
READ FROM THE LIVE SITE 31 Jul 2026, http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~crouch/genealogy/p3.htm, with controls on the same fetch: Crouch x245, Tennessee x11, Washington x14. "Elijah Crouch M, b. 1770, d. 1825. Father: John Crouch b. c 1727, d. c 1811. Mother: Sarah Barbury b. 1729, d. 1782. [grandfather] Joseph Crouch d. 1742. Birth*: Elijah Crouch was born in 1770 at VIRGINIA. He was the son of John Crouch and Sarah Barbury. Marriage*: Elijah Crouch married MARY ELLIS on 16 January 1792 at WASHINGTON, TENNESSEE. Death*: Elijah Crouch died in 1825 at McMINN, TENNESSEE. Family: Mary Ellis b. 1772" ⭐ FOUR OF THIS TREE'S VALUES MATCH THIS PAGE EXACTLY — Elijah 1770/1825, Mary Ellis b. 1772, Sarah Barbary b. 1729/30, and a John Crouch above him. That is a copy relationship, not a coincidence. ⛔ THE MECHANICAL CAUSE OF THE ERROR IS ONE WORD: 'Washington' was resolved to the WRONG STATE — Washington Co., PENNSYLVANIA instead of Washington Co., TENNESSEE. ⭐⭐ AND IT LOCATES THE FABRICATED JOINT: here SARAH BARBARY IS THE WIFE OF JOHN CROUCH (c.1727), an age-appropriate pair, and Elijah is THEIR son. This tree interpolates a 'Nathan Crouch b. 1750' between them and hands him a wife twenty years his senior. Independently, a search of the Somerset Co., Maryland records finds NO NATHAN AT ALL (control: 'Nathan' returns 1,066 hits in the same tax files). ⚠️ ELIJAH IS LISTED HERE WITH MARY ELLIS AND NO CHILDREN, and 'Benedict' appears nowhere on the site — so the Benedict->Elijah link was NOT inherited from this source; it was made separately, on a name. Mary Ellis is given NO DEATH DATE here, so this tree's d.1810 is unsourced, and a SECOND Mary Ellis (b. c.1765, wife of Edmund Bean) sits in the same compilation. ⚠️ THIS SOURCE IS A COMPILATION WITH NO CITATIONS. It proves what was copied. It does not prove the Tennessee facts.

Research notes

Working notes from the research, kept verbatim — what was read, what it proved, what stays open.

Research note · 31 Jul 2026
Audited 31 Jul 2026 — her first. ⚠️ HER DEATH DATE IS UNSOURCED AND LOAD-BEARING, WHICH IS A BAD COMBINATION. The compiled Tennessee source this tree copied gives her b. 1772 Virginia, married Elijah Crouch 16 Jan 1792 at Washington, TENNESSEE — and NO DEATH DATE AT ALL. This tree's 'd. 1810' therefore comes from somewhere else and is uncited. ⛔ THAT MATTERS BECAUSE IT MANUFACTURED AN AUDIT FINDING: [3209] Joseph E. Crouch (1821-1907) is recorded as her son, i.e. born 11 years after she died, which was read as the signature of a MISSING SECOND WIFE. On this evidence it is likelier an artifact of the graft plus a borrowed death date than a real missing woman. RECLASSIFIED: a data-integrity question, not an ancestor hunt — and chasing a remarriage in Washington Co., PENNSYLVANIA is chasing a man who was never there. ⚠️ CONFLATION RISK: the same small compilation carries a SECOND Mary Ellis, b. c.1765, d. after 1839, wife of Edmund Bean. Memo: ancestry/crouch-branch-research.md. ⛔ NOTHING WAS DELETED AND NO LINK WAS CUT: a negative removes support, it does not supply a replacement. Flags are 3=DISPUTED rather than 2=disproven because the case rests on a COMPILED WEBSITE plus census ABSENCES, not on a primary record naming someone else.

Elsewhere

This person on Ancestry (sign-in required)