The Family › Temple–Catchings › Eddings
Salina Eddings
1799–1888
✦ direct ancestor — Owen's 5×-great-grandmother · Carpenter line
Life
- Born
- 7 Oct 1799 · Orange, Virginia
- Died
- 28 Jul 1888 · Randolph, Missouri
Marriage & children
Albert Galletin Mansfield (1819–1852)
Sarah Jane Mansfield (1821–1876)
Robert James Mansfield (1823–1898)
William Thomas Mansfield (1825–1906)
Layton Smith Mansfield (1829–1895)
Virgina Mansfield (1829–1829)
Infant Mansfield (1830–1830)
Nancy Mildred Mansfield (1831–1866)
Elizabeth Mourning Mansfield (1833–1871)
Joesph Allen Mansfield (1837–1912)
Susan Salina Mansfield (1839–1882)
Virginia Mansfield (Died Young) (1840–)
Edward Shipp Mansfield (c. 1840–1845)
Timeline
- 1814MarriedWilliam Herndon Mansfield — Virginia
- 30 Dec 1817MarriedWilliam Herndon Mansfield — Orange County, Virginia, USA
Records behind this page
1850 United States Federal Census
1850 U.S. Census — Silver Creek, Randolph Co., Missouri, dwelling 80: William H Mansfield household
read the transcript
READ FROM THE CENSUS IMAGE BY CLAUDE in Owen's signed-in Chrome, 1 Aug 2026 (not from the index — see the two index errors this caught). Ancestry coll. 8054 rec. 4011246. NARA RG29 M432 Roll 411 p. 201b, line 35, dwelling/family 80. Image 4200571_00411, 12 of 31. William H Mansfield 60 BAPTIST CLERGYMAN real estate $4,000 b. Va Selina 50 b. Va Albert 30 (Farmer) · William S 25 · Nancy M 19 · Elizabeth 17 · Joseph A 13 · Susan S 11 ⭐ MATCHES THE TREE on name, MIDDLE INITIAL and age: Selina 50 = [893] SALINA Eddings b.1799 · Albert 30 = [895] Albert Galletin b.1819 · Nancy M 19 = [900] Nancy MILDRED b.1831 · Elizabeth 17 = [901] Elizabeth MOURNING b.1833 · Joseph A 13 = [902] Joseph ALLEN b.1837 · Susan S 11 = [904] Susan SALINA b.1839. Four of six match on the middle initial itself. ⚠️ THE ONE CONFLICT THE IMAGE DID NOT RESOLVE: 'William S' 25 against the tree's [898] William THOMAS b.1825. The age is exact; the initial is not. The other two initial conflicts in this run resolved in the tree's favour on the image — THIS ONE DID NOT, and it must not be silently assimilated to them. Linked; unexplained. ⭐⭐ NEW, AND THE INDEX COULD NOT HAVE GIVEN IT: his OCCUPATION is BAPTIST CLERGYMAN, with $4,000 in real estate. Neither is in the tree. ⭐ THE MIGRATION FLIP: the birthplace column reads Va for the parents and changes to 'Mo.' at Elizabeth (17, b. c.1833). ⛔ STATE THE LIMIT — the entries above her line are DITTO MARKS whose referent is inferred from the parents' 'Va'. The FLIP is legible; the bracket above it is a reading of dittos. A Virginia->Missouri move c.1831-33 is INDICATED, NOT WRITTEN. Re-read at higher zoom before this drives a fact.
Research notes
Working notes from the research, kept verbatim — what was read, what it proved, what stays open.
Research note · 1 Aug 2026
Audited 1 Aug 2026 — her first, and her first citation. She appears as 'Selina, 50' in the 1850 census of Silver Creek, Randolph Co., Missouri — b. c.1800 against her recorded 1799, and the clerk's 'Selina' for SALINA. Read off the image, not the index. ⚠️ SHE STILL HAS NO PARENTS in this tree. ⭐⭐ THE GENERATION'S FINDING, from the four households read together: A MIGRATION COHORT IN SILVER CREEK, RANDOLPH CO., MISSOURI. Two unrelated families arrive in the same township within a few years of each other in the 1830s, from two different states — MANSFIELD from Virginia (flip at Elizabeth, 17) and CAVENS from Kentucky (flip at Margaret E, 12). That is REGION x ERA x ANCHOR as `stopping-rules.md` sec.3 asks for it: Randolph Co., Missouri, the 1830s, the push west, with four named ancestors standing in it. THIS IS CARPENTER'S ERA HOOK AND IT DID NOT EXIST BEFORE 1 Aug 2026. ⛔ THE LIMIT, STATED: in both households the entries above the flip are DITTO MARKS whose referent is inferred from the parents' state. Each flip is legible; the extent above it is not. Re-read at higher zoom before either bracket is written as a fact. Worksheet: ancestry/carpenter-gen7-census-worksheet-2026-08-01.md
Elsewhere
This person on Ancestry (sign-in required)