Peter Temple
1661–c. 1735
Life
- Born
- 1661
- Died
- between 8 Aug 1735 and 2 Mar 1737 · Bishopstrowe, Warminster, Wiltshire, England
Parents
Marriage & children
Timeline
- —ResidenceBishopstrowe, Warminster, Wiltshire, England
Records behind this page
Unnamed source
Articles 30 Jan 1729/30 ('Hannah the Daughter of the said Peter Temple the elder') + the interest/legacy receipt series
Unnamed source
inventory taken 14 Mar 1736/7
Ancestry.com, England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858 (Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2013)
The National Archives, Kew; Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Series PROB 11; PROB 11/450/343, fos. 311-312. Will of Joseph Temple of the City of Bristol, mercer, dated 31 March 1699, with a codicil of 19 April 1699; proved at London 16 May 1699. ORIGINAL REGISTER IMAGE READ.
read the transcript
Opening: "I Joseph Temple of the City of Bristoll Mercer being fully sensible of the declineing condition of my body but being (blessed be God) of sound and disposing mind and memory considering with my self the certainty of my death and the uncertainty of the time thereof do therefore make and ordain this my last Will and Testament..." Executors: "my loving Brother Peter Temple of Bishopstrow in the County of Wilts Gent, my loving Brother in law Edward Peirce of the Devizes in the County of Wilts Woollen draper, my loving kinsman Morgan Smith of the City of Bristoll Grocer, and my loving friend William Gough of the said City of Bristoll Woollendraper." Wife: "Imprimis I give and bequeath unto my dear and loving wife Hannah Temple the sum of two hundred and fifty pounds of lawfull money of England to be paid unto her within the space of twelve months next after the time of my decease." THE POSTHUMOUS CHILD: "To the use of such Male Child or Children as my said wife is now enseint or goeth with and the heires of the body of such Male Child or Children lawfully to be begotten for ever. And for want of such heires then to the use of such Female Child or Children as my said wife is now enseint or goeth with, my son William Temple and my daughter Mary Temple..." ("enseint or goeth with" = pregnant.) Property: a messuage or tenement with grounds, orchards, gardens and stables "now in the tenure or occupacon of my Tenant [name not legible] situate in Haytsbury in the said County of Wilts" (Heytesbury), and a messuage in Corn Street, Bristol, tenant Robert Webb. Mourning rings at 20s: "my mother in law Mrs Elizabeth Temple, my mother in law Mrs Mary Liston, my said Brother Peter Temple and Mary his wife, my Brother in law Edward Peirce, my said kinsman Morgan Smith and the said William Gough"; and "my Uncle Robert Liston and Mary his wife, my Aunt Joane Wood, my Brother in law Stephen Walter, my loving Nephew Mr William Phillips and Mary his wife and my kinswoman Elizabeth the wife of the said Morgan Smith." Children: legacies to males at 21, to females at 18 or marriage, whichever first; the wife to have the use of the household goods and plate during the minority; "the guardianship tuition and custody of all my said Children unto my said wife, my said Executors and the survivors of them during the several minorities." Dated: "this one and thirtieth day of March in the Eleventh year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord William the Third... And in the year of our Lord God One thousand six hundred ninety and nine" - signed "Jos: Temple." Witnesses: Sarah Swetnam, Richard Cary, Edward Whitehead, Nich: Cooper. Codicil, the nineteenth day of April 1699, adding Joseph Smith of Bristol, ironmonger, as a fifth executor with five pounds. Codicil witnesses: Jos: Smith, Sarah Swetnam, Edward Whitehead, Richard Cary. Probate act: "Probatum fuit huiusmodi Testamentum apud London una cum Codicillo annexo coram venerabili viro Dno Richardo Raines milite... Curiae Prerogat Cantuar... Decimo sexto die mensis Maij Anno Dni Millesimo Sexcentesimo nonagesimo nono Juramentis Petri Temple, Edwardi Peirce, Morgani Smith, Gulielmi Gough et Josephi Smith Executorum..." - all five executors sworn, 16 May 1699.
The National Archives, Kew; Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Series PROB 11; PROB 11/383/207 (register Lloyd, quires 46-90; image ref. 209). Will of William Temple of Bishopstrow, co. Wilts, dated 1 May 1685; proved at London 19 May 1686. ORIGINAL REGISTER IMAGE READ.
read the transcript
Opening: "I William Temple of Bishopstrow in the County of Wilts being (praised bee God) at this time IN PERFECT HEALTH and of good memory and understanding, Revokeing all former and other Wills, doe make and ordaine this to bee my last Will and Testament and doe dispose of my estate as followeth." (NOT a deathbed will - he lived at least another year.) DAUGHTERS: "Imprimis I give unto my Daughter Mary Ivyleafe five pounds. Alsoe I give unto her Two Daughters Mary and Rebeckah Tenne pounds a peece to buy each of them a peece of plate. Item I give unto my Daughter Anne Pearse five pounds; also I give unto her two Daughters Anne and Margaret Tenne pounds a peece to buy each of them a peece of plate." SON JOSEPH: "Item I give unto my sonne Joseph ELEAVEN HUNDRED POUNDS to bee paid him when hee shall accomplish the age of ONE AND TWENTY YEARES. Alsoe I give and bequeath unto him after my decease MY FREE LAND AND COPPYHOLD ESTATE IN HATCHBURY. Alsoe I give and bequeath unto him after my decease my Annuall Rent of Twenty pounds per annum payable out of the parsonage of [Wittcombe?]." WIFE ELIZABETH: "Item I give unto Elizabeth my wife all such Plate and Goods AS WAS HERS BEFORE I MARRIED WITH HER, and alsoe my will is that shee shall have and enjoy dureing her life all such houshold stuffe and goods as shall bee in my farme house att UPTON att the time of my decease, and afterwards shall leave it to him that shall succeed in my ffarme. Alsoe I give unto her Twenty pounds as a token of my love." SERVANT AND POOR: "Item I give unto my servant Betty Oatley five pounds if shee shall bee liveing with mee at the time of my decease. Item I give unto the Poore of the Parish of Bishopstrow five pounds, to bee distributed as the Parson of the Parish and my Executor shall thinke fitt." SON PETER: "Item I give and bequeath unto my sonne Peter MY FFARME AND MANNOR IN BISHOPSTROW withall the appurtenances thereunto belonging. Also I give unto him after the death of Elizabeth my wife my Lease and farme at Upton WHICH I BOUGHT OF SR EDWARD HUNGERFORD. Also all the Rest of my goods and Chattells (except before excepted) I give unto my sonne Peter, whom I doe hereby make and ordaine to bee my sole and whole Executor of this my last Will and Testament." DATE AND WITNESSES: "In witnesse hereof I have hereunto sett my hand & seale this FIRST OF MAY in the yeare of our Lord God One Thousand six hundred eighty and five" - signed "Will: Temple." Witnesses: John Mathew, William Stokes, Elizabeth Oatley, Jn: Gibbs his marke. (Betty Oatley the servant and Elizabeth Oatley the witness are the same woman.) PROBATE: "Probatum fuit huiusmodi Testamentum apud London coram venerabili et Egregio viro Richardo Raines Legum Doctore, Curiae Prerogativae Cantuariensis Magistro Custode sive Commissario legitime constituto, DECIMO NONO DIE MENSIS MAIJ Anno Domini millesimo sexcentesimo octogesimo sexto, Juramento PETRI TEMPLE FILII ET EXECUTORIS..." - 19 May 1686, sworn by Peter Temple, son and executor. Richard Raines is the same judge who proved Joseph of Bristol's will in 1699. TRAP: page 2 of the ordered PDF is the NEXT entry in the register - the will of John Wagstaffe of Glossop, co. Derby. Not this family.
The National Archives, Kew; Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Series PROB 11; PROB 11/485/235 (register Gee, quires 223-265; image ref. 358). Will of Elizabeth Temple, widow, of Bishopstrow, co. Wilts, dated 17 September 1705; proved at London 3 December 1705. ORIGINAL REGISTER IMAGE READ.
read the transcript
Opening: "I ELIZABETH TEMPLE of the Parish of BISHOPSTROW in the County of Wilts, WIDDOW, being sensible of my declineing Condition, but blessed be God at present of good and perfect mind and memory, doe make and ordaine this to be my last Will and Testament (hereby revoakeing all former Wills by me made)..." HER OWN KIN - the first bequests, and they give her family: "Imprimis I give and bequeath unto my lo: Brother JOHN BENNETT Esq and to my Sister ffrances his wife five pounds each..." · (margin) "Item I give and bequeath to my lo: Bro: WILL: BENNET Esq and to my Sister Catherine his Wife five pounds each and also twenty shillings each to buy them Rings" · "my nephew THOMAS BENNETT five pounds to be paid when he comes to the age of twenty one yeares" · "my lo: Sister MARY KIRKMAN ten pounds, as alsoe the Bedd, Boulster, Curtains, Vallens, Rugg and Blanketts with four green Chaires now in my Chamber at BISHOPSTROW" · "my lo: Kinswoman ELIZABETH daughter of my Sister Kirkman aforesaid ten pounds" · "my Brother in Law EDWARD CARRANT Esqr twenty shillings to buy him a Ring." OTHER KIN AND FRIENDS: "my lo: Kinsman Tho: LAMBERT of the Citty of New Sarum five pounds" · "my lo: Kinsman BENJAMIN KENDALL and SARAH his wife twenty shillings each and alsoe the furniture belonging to my Hall Chamber in UPTON" · "my lo: Kinsman THOMAS WALLIS twenty shillings" · "my lo: Kinsman [-] PALMER twenty shillings And to my Kinswoman ANNE his wife forty pounds with my two silver Salvers" · "my Coz: MARY SWIFT, BENJ: GIFFORD Esq and DOCTOR WICKMAN twenty shillings each to buy them Rings." ⭐⭐ THE PEIRCE FAMILY: "I give unto my lo: SONNE IN LAW ED: PEIRCE five pounds And alsoe to his SIX CHILDREN ANNE, MARGARET, MARY, EDWARD, JOHN and THOMAS five pounds each, to be paid when they come of age 21 yeares the Sonns / 18 the Daughters." ★★ THE VIRGINIA LINE, NAMED AND LIVING: "Item I give unto my lo: DAUGHTER IN LAW HANNAH TEMPLE five pounds And alsoe to her THREE CHILDREN forty pounds viz To MARY TEMPLE twenty pounds, To WILL: TEMPLE and JOSEPH TEMPLE ten pounds each, to be paid when they come of the age of 21 yeares the Sonns and 18 yeares the Daughters." PETER'S FAMILY: "Item I give unto my daughter in Law MARY TEMPLE five pounds, as alsoe to her SIX CHILDREN viz SAM:, MARY, ANNE, ELIZABETH, PRISCILLA and PETER five pounds each to be paid at the age of 21 yeares the Sonns and 18 yeares the Daughters." SERVANT, POOR, RESIDUE: "my Servant PRUDENCE CARTER five pounds if she be liveing with me as my Servant at the time of my Death" · "unto the poor of the Parish of UPTON five pounds to be distributed as my Executor shall thinke fitt" · "all the rest and residue of my Goods and Chattells unto my lo: SON IN LAW PETER TEMPLE whom I make, appoint and ordaine my whole and sole Executor of this my last Will and Testament." DATE: "In Witnesse whereof I have sett my hand and Seale this SEAVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER in the yeare of our Lord God one thousand seaven hundred and five" - ⭐ subscribed "THE MARKE of Eliz: Temple": SHE COULD NOT WRITE. Witnesses: MARY CHOE, WILLIAM PRYOR, PRUDENCE CARTER, RICHARD ARCHER his mark. PROBATE: "Probatum fuit huiusmodi Testamentum apud London coram venerabili et Egregio viro Dno RICHARDO RAINES Milite Legum Doctore Curiae Prerogativae Cantuar Magistro Custode sive Commissario legitime constituto TERTIO DIE DECEMBRIS Anno Dni millesimo septingentesimo quinto Juramento PETRI TEMPLE Executoris in dicto Testamento nominati..." - 3 December 1705, sworn by Peter Temple, executor. Richard Raines also proved William Temple in 1686 and Joseph Temple in 1699.
Will of Peter Temple, Gentleman of Bishopstrow, Wiltshire — PROB 11/688/108, register Brodrepp, ff. 279-280; made 11 Jun 1731, proved 2 Mar 1737/8
read the transcript
The National Archives, Kew — Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Will Registers, PROB 11/688/108, register BRODREPP (PROB 11/688 = quires 45-94), folios 279-280. Catalogue title "Will of Peter Temple, Gentleman of Bishopstrow, Wiltshire", catalogue date 02 March 1738 (the probate). ORDERED AND READ IN THE ORIGINAL 31 Jul 2026. PDF and page images: ancestry/sources/peter-temple-bishopstrow-1738-will-PROB-11-688-108.pdf OPENING: "I PETER TEMPLE of Bishopstrow in the County of Wilts Gent, revoking all former Wills by me made, doe declare my last Will and Testament to be as follows." MOURNING RINGS AND LEGACIES, verbatim in substance: "first I give and bequeath unto my Son PETER TEMPLE and ANNE his Wife, my son in law JOSEPH DOWDLE and MARY his Wife, my son in law JOHN BENNETT and [wife], my son in law EDWARD MIDDLECOTT and ELIZABETH his wife, my son in law HENRY CLARKE and PRISCILLA his Wife, and unto my son in law JOHN FOREMAN and SUSANNAH his wife, ten pounds each for a Mourning. Item I give unto my BROTHER BARTHOLOMEW TEMPLE five pounds. Item I give and bequeath to my COUSINS WILLIAM TEMPLE and JOSEPH TEMPLE twenty shillings each for Rings. Item I give to my DAUGHTER IN LAW MARY TEMPLE my Chariot, my pair of Coach horses and Harness. Item I give to my SISTER IN LAW MRS ELIZABETH PEIRCE OF BROUGHTON IN THE COUNTY OF DEVON five pounds. Item I give unto my Cousin Mr NATHANIEL HE[S-] and ANNE his Wife, Mrs MARGARETT PEIRCE, Mr THOMAS PEIRCE and MARY his Wife, Mr JOHN BUTLER and MARY his wife, Mrs ELIZABETH GOUGH and Mrs ELIZABETH PEIRCE Widow twenty shillings each for Rings. Item I give five pounds to be distributed at the discretion of my said son Peter Temple amongst the poor persons of Bishopstrow aforesaid not having releife of the said Parish. Item I give to the REVEREND MR SAMUEL BATES forty shillings to preach my funerall Sermon. Item I give unto my servant RICHARD ARCHILD forty shillings if liveing with me at the time of my decease..." ⭐⭐ RELIGION, in his own words: "...I request my eldest Grandson PETER TEMPLE, to whom I give and bequeath all the rest and residue of my Goods Chattells and personall Estate and whom I make SOLE EXECUTOR of this my last Will and Testament, to pay to the Minister for the time being of the MEETING HOUSE IN WARMINSTER WHEREUNTO I BELONG the yearly sum of seven pounds and ten shillings." A MEETING HOUSE is a Nonconformist congregation — this is the first evidence of the family's religion anywhere in this tree. THE 1722 SETTLEMENTS: "...by two deeds or Marriage Settlements both dated THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND TWENTY TWO made on the MARRIAGE OF MY LATE SON with MRS MARY LANGLEY HIS NOW WIDOW..." — trustees "THOMAS BENNETT ESQ and WILLIAM SEAMAN GENT who is since dead"; £800 charged on the estates for the grandsons, administered by "my said son Peter Temple and my said kinsman JOHN LANGLEY". DATED: "In Witness whereof I have hereunto put my hand and Seale the ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE in the year of Our Lord One thousand seven hundred and THIRTY ONE. — PETER TEMPLE." Witnesses: "Li: SEAMAN, Wm KING, WILLIAM LANGLEY." PROBATE: "On the SECOND DAY OF MARCH in the year of Our Lord One Thousand seven hundred and THIRTY SEVEN issued forth a Commission to MARY TEMPLE WIDOW THE MOTHER AND CURATRIX lawfully assigned to PETER TEMPLE A MINOR the eldest Grandson and sole Executor named in the last Will and Testament of Peter Temple late of Bishopstrow in the County of Wilts deceased, to administer the Goods Chattells and Credits of the said deceased... for the use and benefit of the said Minor UNTILL HE SHALL ATTAIN THE AGE OF SEVENTEEN YEARS." ⭐ SO HIS DEATH IS BRACKETED: alive and signing 11 Jun 1731, dead by 2 Mar 1737/8. WSHC's catalogue of the family papers says "Peter Temple (died 1736) (P.C.C)" and VCH Wilts. viii fn 27 cites "W.R.O. 132, Inv. of Peter Temple, 1736" — neither read by us, so 1736 is noted but the DATE FIELD carries only what this document proves. ⛔ AN INTERNAL CONFLICT, RECORDED NOT RESOLVED: the will calls grandson Peter "one of the Children of my said Son PETER Temple" (read at 4.5x; the word is unambiguously Peter), yet the probate makes MARY TEMPLE WIDOW his MOTHER, while son Peter's wife is named ANNE in the will — and the 1722 settlement is on "my LATE Son" and Mary Langley, which WSHC catalogues as SAMUEL's and which VCH makes the father of the brothers Peter and William. The will and its own probate cannot both be read plainly. DO NOT merge Samuel and Peter; do not 'fix' the parentage. ⭐ THREE ALLIED SURNAMES ACROSS FOUR GENERATIONS: SEAMAN (John Temple's wife d.1637, his overseers, and here a trustee and a witness), BENNETT (Elizabeth Temple's brothers in 1705, and here a trustee AND a son-in-law), PEIRCE (attested in three earlier wills; here a sister-in-law and four more).
Research notes
Working notes from the research, kept verbatim — what was read, what it proved, what stays open.
Research note · 21 Aug 2026
Audited 31 Jul 2026. Junction #1. He had THREE citations and ONE event before today - a birth of 1661 carrying no citation - so this note records what those three documents actually say. HE IS NAMED IN ALL THREE BISHOPSTROW WILLS READ ON 31 JUL, in a different role each time, and all three were read from the original PCC register image. (1) His father [89] WILLIAM TEMPLE's will, PROB 11/383/207, dated 1 May 1685, proved 19 May 1686: 'Item I give and bequeath unto my sonne PETER my ffarme and Mannor in Bishopstrow withall the appurtenances thereunto belonging', plus - after the widow Elizabeth's death - 'my Lease and farme at Upton which I bought of Sr Edward Hungerford', plus all the residue; and 'my sonne Peter whom I doe hereby make and ordaine to bee my sole and whole Executor'. The probate act names him: 'Juramento PETRI TEMPLE FILII ET EXECUTORIS'. ⭐ THIS IS WHAT PROVES HIS PARENTAGE, and his ProofFather/ProofMother are set to 1 accordingly (they were undefined). The same sentence pattern proves his brother [35] Joseph, whose flags were set in the same write. (2) His brother [35] JOSEPH TEMPLE of Bristol's will, PROB 11/450/343, 31 Mar 1699: 'my loving Brother PETER TEMPLE OF BISHOPSTROW in the County of Wilts, GENT' - named FIRST EXECUTOR, and sworn as such at London 16 May 1699. ⭐ It also gives him a WIFE: a mourning ring to 'my said Brother Peter Temple and MARY his wife'. (3) His step-mother [3350] ELIZABETH TEMPLE's will, PROB 11/485/235, 17 Sep 1705: 'my lo: Son in Law Peter Temple, whom I make, appoint and ordaine my whole and sole Executor', and residuary legatee; sworn 3 Dec 1705. ⭐ The step-relation held for NINETEEN YEARS after his father's death - she made her husband's son by another woman her sole executor. DEATH: recorded as 'aft 3 Dec 1705', the day he was sworn as Elizabeth's executor and the last date he is documented alive. NOT a guess; a last-seen bound. ⭐ LIVE LEAD FOR CLOSING IT: a SECOND Peter Temple of Bishopstrow has a PCC will, d. abt 1737, and VCH Wilts. vol. 8 fn 27 cites 'W.R.O. 132, Inv. of Peter Temple, 1736'. That is very probably THIS man, and it is a free TNA pull. VCH also has him buying the Bishopstrow demesne farm in 1689 and redeeming a 50-pound rent in 1690 - consistent, and uncited here. ⛔ HIS FAMILY IS MISSING FROM THE TREE and is NOT created here - Elizabeth's 1705 will names 'my daughter in Law MARY TEMPLE' and her SIX children: SAM:, MARY, ANNE, ELIZABETH, PRISCILLA and PETER. Burke's LG 1858 independently gives SAMUEL b. 1695 as the son who continued at Bishopstrow, then Peter b. 1723 d. 1755 unm. and William b. 1726. Seven people; queued for Owen's decision, not taken. NOTE: Owen does NOT descend through Peter - the Virginia line runs through his brother Joseph - so this branch is corroborative, not ancestral. ⚠️ The 1661 birth is Burke's, not a record, and is left uncited. Memo: ancestry/temple-arnold-liston-junction.md ── 31 Jul 2026 (late): HIS FAMILY IS NOW IN THE TREE, on Owen's explicit decision. Wife MARY (maiden name unknown - blank surname, do not guess) and six children SAMUEL, MARY, ANNE, ELIZABETH, PRISCILLA and PETER, all from [3350] Elizabeth Temple's will of 17 Sep 1705, with Mary independently corroborated by [35] Joseph's 1699 will ('Mary his wife'). All six were MINORS in Sep 1705 - legacies at 21 for the sons, 18 for the daughters - which is recorded in their notes and NOT in any date field. ⭐ Burke's LG 1858 continues the line through SAMUEL b. 1695, so 'Sam:' is very probably that Samuel. ── ADDENDUM 31 Jul 2026: HIS OWN WILL HAS BEEN ORDERED FROM TNA AND READ — PROB 11/688/108, register Brodrepp, ff. 279-280, signed 11 JUNE 1731 and proved 2 MARCH 1737/8. ⭐ HIS DEATH MOVES FROM 'aft 3 Dec 1705' TO BETWEEN 11 JUN 1731 AND 2 MAR 1738 — a 33-year improvement, and the bracket is what the document itself proves. ⚠ WSHC's catalogue says "Peter Temple (died 1736) (P.C.C) of Bishopstrow" and VCH Wilts. viii fn 27 cites "W.R.O. 132, Inv. of Peter Temple, 1736"; NEITHER has been read by us, so 1736 is recorded here and NOT in the date field. ⭐⭐ HE WAS A NONCONFORMIST, in his own words: he leaves £7 10s yearly "to the Minister for the time being of the MEETING HOUSE IN WARMINSTER WHEREUNTO I BELONG". This is the first evidence of the family's religion anywhere in this tree. ⭐ THE WILL NAMES A LARGE FAMILY, none of it entered (queued for Owen): son PETER TEMPLE and ANNE his wife; FIVE SONS-IN-LAW with their wives — Joseph Dowdle × Mary, JOHN BENNETT, Edward Middlecott × Elizabeth, Henry Clarke × Priscilla, John Foreman × Susannah; BROTHER BARTHOLOMEW TEMPLE; cousins William and Joseph Temple; daughter-in-law MARY TEMPLE (his chariot and coach horses); sister-in-law Mrs ELIZABETH PEIRCE of Broughton, co. Devon; grandsons PETER (eldest, sole executor, a MINOR at probate) and WILLIAM. ⭐⭐ THREE ALLIED SURNAMES NOW RUN THROUGH FOUR GENERATIONS OF THIS JUNCTION: SEAMAN — [91] John Temple's wife was Mary Seaman and his overseers were William and Samuel Seaman (1636); here WILLIAM SEAMAN Gent is a 1722 trustee and a 'Li: Seaman' witnesses. BENNETT — [3350] Elizabeth Temple's 1705 will names her brothers 'John and Will: Bennett Esq'; here THOMAS BENNETT Esq is a trustee and JOHN BENNETT is a son-in-law. PEIRCE — attested in three earlier wills as Anne Temple's husband's family; here a sister-in-law and four more Peirces. ⛔ AN INTERNAL CONFLICT, RECORDED NOT RESOLVED: the will calls grandson Peter 'one of the Children of my said Son PETER Temple' (read at 4.5x, unambiguously Peter), but the probate issues to 'MARY TEMPLE Widow THE MOTHER and Curatrix' of that minor grandson, while son Peter's wife is ANNE — and the 1722 settlements are on 'my LATE Son' and Mrs MARY LANGLEY 'his now Widow', which WSHC catalogues as SAMUEL's marriage and which VCH makes the parentage of the brothers Peter and William. The will and its own probate cannot both be read plainly. DO NOT merge Samuel and Peter and do not 'fix' the parentage. ⚠ Samuel's death (implied before 11 Jun 1731 by 'my late Son') was NOT entered: identifying the late son as Samuel rests on a WSHC catalogue entry whose document nobody has read. ➡️ WSHC 132/34 holds TWO ORIGINAL WILLS of Peter plus an inventory, and 132/38 his final-illness accounts including his doctor's bill. Memo: ancestry/temple-arnold-liston-junction.md ── ADDENDUM 31 Jul 2026 (3): THE 1731 WILL'S PEOPLE ARE NOW IN THE TREE, at the scope Owen approved. ⭐⭐ CHECKED FIRST: SIX OF THEM ALREADY EXISTED - his wife [3372] Mary and the six children created the same evening from [3350] Elizabeth Temple's 1705 will - so this write MARRIED his daughters rather than creating them again. ⭐ THE TWO WILLS DOVETAIL: the 1705 minors MARY, ELIZABETH and PRISCILLA are the 1731 wives of JOSEPH DOWDLE, EDWARD MIDDLECOTT and HENRY CLARKE, and son PETER now has his wife ANNE. Each identification is graded STRONG in the husband's own note - the 1731 will names the wives but does not call them the testator's daughters in so many words. ⭐ A SEVENTH CHILD: SUSANNAH, wife of JOHN FOREMAN, who is NOT among the six of 1705 - which PROVES THAT LIST IS NOT CLOSED. ⛔ JOHN BENNETT is created but MARRIED TO NOBODY: the will does not name his wife, and although [3375] ANNE is the only 1705 daughter left unaccounted for, Susannah shows the daughter-set is open, so elimination proves nothing. ⛔ BARTHOLOMEW TEMPLE, 'my brother', is created but ATTACHED TO NOBODY, and the reason is a CONTRADICTION FOUND TODAY: [89] William's own 1685/6 will names FOUR children - Joseph, Peter, Mary Ivyleafe, Anne Pearse - and Bartholomew is not among them, yet he was alive in 1731. Either 'brother' is loose usage, or [89]'s will is not the closed list we have been reading. ⭐⭐ THE GRANDSONS DID GET A MOTHER, which the queue had not anticipated: the queue's 'attach them to nobody' was written against the FATHER conflict (Peter-vs-Samuel), but the PROBATE settles the other parent outright - 'MARY TEMPLE WIDOW THE MOTHER AND CURATRIX lawfully assigned to PETER TEMPLE A MINOR'. MARY LANGLEY is created and the two grandsons attached to a family with NO FATHER: Peter ProofMother=1 (PROVEN), William ProofMother=0 (the probate names only Peter). No father is asserted for either boy and no marriage is created for Mary. ➡ WSHC 132/34 and 132/5 remain the documents that would close it. NOT CREATED: the ring-money cousins William and Joseph Temple, the five Peirces, Butler, Gough, trustees Thomas Bennett and William Seaman, kinsman John Langley, the Rev. Samuel Bates and the servant Richard Archild.── AUDITED ADDENDUM 21 Aug 2026 (WSHC 132 delivery, K233-K237): THE DELIVERY ARRIVED AND WAS READ 21 Aug 2026 (order res 5231; K233-K237; images + full transcriptions in ancestry/sources/wshc-132-temple-bishopstrow-2026-08-21/NOTES.md). ★★ THE INTERNAL CONFLICT RECORDED ABOVE IS RESOLVED: there were TWO grandsons named Peter. 'My eldest Grandson Peter Temple' (executor, the minor whose mother Mary was curatrix) is SAMUEL's son [3391]; 'my Grandson Peter Temple one of ye Children of my sd Son Peter Temple' is a THIRD grandson, a child of the LIVING son [3378] Peter (of Boreham, Clothier) and his wife ARUNDELL. The chain: settlement 20 Jun 1722 'Samuel Temple ... eldest son of the said Peter and Mary' marrying 'Mary Langley Spinster Daughter of the said Anne Langley', entail to 'the first Son of the Body of the said Samuel Temple on the Body of the said Mary Langley' (WSHC 132/23); Samuel's bond same date, 'ffather and Mother of the said Samuel Temple'; the 1730 will 'the marriage of my Son Samuel Temple'; the admon 19 Oct 1731 'Relictae Samuelis Temple ... ab intestato' (WSHC 132/110); the probate 'Mary Temple Widow the Mother and Curatrix ... the Eldest Grandson'. ⛔ FOUR CORRECTIONS against the 31 Jul register reading, on FIVE concordant instruments (four wills + the PCC exemplification, WSHC 132/112): son Peter's wife is ARUNDELL not Anne · Joseph HARBATTLE not Dowdle (his own receipt signs 'Jos Harbattelle') · John Foreman's wife is HANNAH not Susannah — and the 1723/4 will says 'my Daughter Hannah' (minor, 1,000 at 21), the 1729/30 Articles 'Hannah the Daughter of the said Peter Temple the elder' · 'my Brother in Law Bartholomew ANTHONY' not 'brother Bartholomew Temple' — the contradiction with [89]'s child-list recorded above DISSOLVES. ★ HIS DEATH, sharpened twice: there were FOUR wills (23 Jan 1723/4 · 16 Aug 1729 · 24 Jul 1730 · the proved 11 Jun 1731); the INVENTORY (VCH fn 27's document) was 'taken March the 14th 1736[/7]' (day figure overwritten, possibly 12), total 1,163:4:1 (goods 153:13:3, bonds & interest 699:5:10, rent due at Lady Day 1737 310:5:0 — arithmetic verified), appraisers John Trench and Thomas Warren; and the RECEIPTS (WSHC 132/111) show him paying Henry Clarke's interest IN PERSON on 8 Aug 1735 while the first legacy under the will was paid 2 Mar 1736/7 ('a Legacy left by her Father Temple' — Samuel Bates's receipt) ⇒ DEATH BETWEEN 8 AUG 1735 AND 2 MAR 1736/7 (date field updated; payer shifted to Mrs Mary Temple by 7 Feb 1735/6, suggestive of late 1735/early 1736). ★ The 1723/4 will adds: 274:17:6 SOUTH SEA COMPANY capital stock 'in the hands of Mr Joseph Eyles Merchant in London'; wife Mary alive (use of chariot/plate/books during widowhood); daughters Mary, Elizabeth, Priscilla unmarried at 1,000 pounds each; 'my Daughter Hannah' a minor. The inventory's 'Father's Closet' is a catalogued NONCONFORMIST LIBRARY (Poole, Foxe, Perkins, Quick's Synodicon, Clarke's Lives, Cotton's Concordance, ~100 small books) — corroborating the meeting-house bequests, which appear in all four wills. ★ JUNCTION #1: the ring-money 'cousins William and Joseph Temple' — a receipt of 16 Jan 1737/8 signed 'Willm: Temple' calls the testator 'my late Unkle' and collects 'a Legacy left to my Brother' too (WSHC 132/111); [89]'s closed child-list leaves the sons of [35] Joseph of Bristol — [1815] William and [33] Col. Joseph Temple of VIRGINIA — as the only possible Temple-surname nephews. STRONG, not proven; no proof flag is set from it. Mary Temple administered this estate c.t.a. to the grandson's release of 3 Nov 1744.
Elsewhere
This person on Ancestry (sign-in required)