You are looking atTemple–Catchings· your father's sideWoodall–Ramsay →

The FamilyTemple–CatchingsFowlkes

Henry Bass Fowlkes II

1789–1865

Tabitha Bass I 1763–1825Henry Bass Fowlkes I 1750–1808Tabitha Hatcher 1742–c. 1800John Bass, Sr. 1738–c. 1808Sarah Elizabeth Jennings Fowlkes 1730–1782Senator John Anthony Fowlkes\Foulks 1722–1799Martha Clay 1713–1745William Bass 1707–1775Elizabeth c. 1700–1730(Lt. Col.) Gabriel Fowlkes\Foulks (the immigrant) 1696–1775MaryHenry Clay c. 1672–c. 1760Mary –1717William Bass c. 1684–c. 1748Mary Fowlkes Cheatham 1665–1720Gabriel Fowlkes\Foulks I 1665–1740
The known sky above this person — every wedge an ancestor, parents innermost. Click a wedge to visit.

Life

Born
4 Oct 1789 · Virginia, United States
Died
12 Feb 1865 · Dyer, Tennessee, United States

Parents

FatherHenry Bass Fowlkes I (1750–1808)
MotherTabitha Bass I (1763–1825)

Records behind this page

Lunenburg County, Virginia, Chancery Cause 111-1809-004, Fowlkes v. Fowlkes - Library of Virginia
bill of complaint - Henry Fowlkes, orator, devisee of one third

Research notes

Working notes from the research, kept verbatim — what was read, what it proved, what stays open. Many open with a line grading the parentage; what the grades mean.

Research note · 5 Aug 2026
AUDITED 5 Aug 2026 - [1260] HENRY BASS FOWLKES, first citation of any kind. He is the orator - the plaintiff - in Library of Virginia Chancery, Lunenburg County, cause 111-1809-004, Fowlkes v. Fowlkes, suing his mother as executrix to compel partition of a tract in Lunenburg devised to him by his father's will. He takes one third; his brothers John B. [1289] and Elisha [1284] take the other two thirds. See [1258]'s note for the full transcription. ⛔ AN UNRESOLVED TENSION, RECORDED RATHER THAN SMOOTHED: the bill says the executrix refused to assign "because the other two devisees were infants", which implies this Henry was NOT an infant, i.e. of age. The tree gives his birth as 4 Oct 1789, making him 19 in November 1808. Either the birth year is a year or two early - it is UNCITED, so entirely possible - or the pleading is loose. The birth field has deliberately NOT been changed on this inference.

Elsewhere

This person on Ancestry (sign-in required)