Anne Waring

PROOF CLASS: MOTHER = UNDERDETERMINED (Owen graded 13 Sep 2026, ring-7 E2). Francis Waring's 1770/71 Essex will names seven children and NO WIFE. Reopens on an Essex dower release naming his wife, or on son Thomas Waring's 1803 estate. PROOF CLASS: FATHER = DIRECT (relabel 13 Sep 2026; flag 1 unchanged). Francis Waring's 1770/71 Essex will, read on the original register image (cit 6999), divides his estate among seven children named, 'Ann Waring' among them. Audited 13 Sep 2026 - [56] Anne Waring's FIRST audit, written in ring 7's E2 triage pass (E2-ring7-triage-2026-09-13.md; register K662, K663). WHAT IS IN HAND. Her father's own will - Essex Co., Va., Will Book 12, pp. 431-433, signed Oct 1770, codicil 5 Oct 1771, proved 21 Oct 1771 - READ ON THE ORIGINAL REGISTER IMAGE (FS DGS 007645973 item 2, imgs 234-235; local copies ancestry/sources/essex-willbook12-pp43*.jpeg; cits 6999 and 7000). It divides the residue among "my seven Children her after named ... Thomas Gouldman Waring, William Waring, Henry Waring, Elizth. Ball, Lucy Robb, Ann Waring, & Susanna Waring". WHY THAT DOES NOT REACH THE MOTHER. The same instrument names sons, daughters and two sons-in-law (Spencer Mot. Ball, James Robb) and NO WIFE (cit 7000, recorded expressly). So the document that settles the father is silent on the mother. [1760] Lucy Cocke is named as the mother nowhere in anything attached to either of them. The half is unlabelled for want of evidence - no record has been read that contradicts it, so this is NOT a reviewed no and must not be recorded or restated as one. WHO SHE IS, settled independently of the will and not by the name alone: Essex chancery cause 057-1817-002 (read on the manuscript, 3 Aug 2026) divides the residue of Thomas Waring, d. 1803, son of this testator, between his sisters "Ann Latane & Susanna Lewis" - precisely the two daughters still unmarried, and so still surnamed Waring, in 1771. The married-surname pair matches the unmarried pair. REFUSED, DELIBERATELY, SO IT IS NOT REDISCOVERED AS A LEAD: the same will devises a tract called "Cocke land". A TRACT NAME IS NOT A MARRIAGE. The surname echo against [1760] Lucy Cocke is a coincidence of the exact kind the two-shapes test exists to refuse, and it may not be used to upgrade this half. THE FATHER HALF IS NOT CLASSED HERE, AND THAT IS DELIBERATE. Its flag is 1 and it carries no class line. Writing one is a relabel of an already-flagged half, which runs only when Owen asks for it by name (/ancestry review); proposal-lint refused it as a triage proposal and was right. The evidence for it is the will quoted above, ready when that lane runs.